Agbakoba said since Nigeria left the modernity of regionalism, the states have been unviable, apart from Lagos and Rivers.
By Jeffrey Agbo
Former President of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Olisa Agbakoba, has said that calls for the creation of new states in the South-East are misplaced priority.
A bill for the creation of Etiti State is receiving attention in the House of Representatives.
Similarly, some lawmakers and stakeholders have also called for the creation of Anioma State from states in the South South and South East regions.
One of those leading the call, Senator Ned Nwoko (PDP, Delta North), said the creation of Anioma State would correct what he described as the marginalisation of South East geo-political zone.
According to him, if Anioma State is created, it will increase the population of the South-East, increase the land mass as well as the resource base of the region.
Speaking with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos on Sunday, Agbakoba said Nigeria does not need more states.
According to him, lawmakers and other political stakeholders should be concerned about restructuring Nigeria to a regional government to reflect the real diversity of the country.
He added that he was not in support of additional state because most of the 36 states are economically unviable, insolvent and not capable of bringing about infrastructural development and even paying the proposed minimum wage.
“State creation at this present harsh economic will, no doubt, lead to increase in the number of National Assembly members, ministers, local governments, and others, which would further increase the cost of governance in the country.
“This is coming at a time when most Nigerians are starving due to rise in the food prices. Insurgents, bandits and terrorists are abducting people for ransom in other states of the country. Therefore, the National Assembly should, instead return the country to the regionalism by collapsing the 36 states into six to eight regions or geopolitical zones, each of which will have a leader. This means that the present Nigeria 1999 Constitution would be amended or a new one written to accommodate this proposal.
READ ALSO:
RULAAC, others petition NHRC to probe ‘systematic’ human rights violations in South East
“This is because making a new constitution for Nigeria has become an overriding imperative based on the fact that new political realities and conundrums have cropped up in the country,” Agbakoba said.
The human right activist said the only way to resolve the socio-economic and political problems was to amend the 1999 constitution to pave the way for a regional system of government.
He said regional governments were once successfully run with Chief Obafemi Awolowo in charge of the South West, Chief Michael Okpara in charge of South East and Ahmadu Bello in the North.
Agbakoba said since Nigeria left the modernity of regionalism, the states have been unviable, apart from Lagos and Rivers.
Agbakoba said though the impulse to create a sixth state in the South-East was for the purpose of balance ,but that the greater good of Nigeria would be felt if regionalism is given a chance.
He said regional system of government would enable the unviable states to come together and become stronger.
“This agitation will arise because it is on the basis of the number of states that federal allocation flows.
“So the fact that the South-East has five states mean to them that they are losing revenue and that is a one point of view and also an emotional point of their agitation.
“However, a pragmatic developmental point of view, which I go for, is that even if you create a sixth state in the South-East to give them a sense of belonging, will this new state in addition to the 36 states take us towards the path of development? Will it reverse the hunger, insecurity, poverty and unemployment in the land? Absolutely not.
“We need to do away from state creation to regional system of government,” he said.
