Sagay said he strongly believed that it was Shasore that attempted to mislead the court by using his name in the P&ID case.
By Jeffrey Agbo
Senior lawyer, Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), has debunked links to the Process and Industry Development (P&ID) over the firm’s attempt get the Nigerian government to pay it $11 billion.
Sagay was alleged to have acted as a consultant to the firm during its legal tussle with Nigeria.
The constitutional lawyer told journalists in Abuja on Saturday that he felt embarrassed by the reports that he had provided consultancy services for P&ID.
He said it was even more embarrassing that his name was mentioned in the judgment delivered by a London court.
In the judgment delivered by Justice Robin Knowles, it was stated that former Lagos Attorney-General, Olasupo Shasore (SAN), wrote to Sagay on March 25, 2014 to ask if the latter could provide an expert report on Nigerian law in response to the expert report that Justice Alfa Belgore had written.
It was stated that Sagay agreed to do so and documents were sent to him on April 2, 2014 and that the next day, in a letter of April 3, 2004, Sagay wrote to Shasore identifying his fee for an expert report.
Sagay was quoted as saying that he had “gone through all of” the documents that had been sent and expressed the view that the Ministry of Petroleum Resources “appeared to be in a very difficult legal position” that Justice Belgore’s opinion was “quite formidable”, and that “it will therefore take a tremendous level of research and intellectual work to counter his arguments and the claimant’s case.”
READ ALSO:
Nigeria has secured landmark ruling against P&ID, says Malami
However, while responding to the report, Sagay said he was never involved in the P&ID case, adding that he strongly believed that it was Shasore that had attempted to mislead the court by using his name.
He said, “I have been receiving calls from all over the country following reports that I was employed as a consultant to give an opposing view to the one presented by Justice Belgore as part of their legal strategy against the Nigerian government.
“I strongly believe this was concocted by Shasore who is being prosecuted for his role in the P&ID case. I never acted as a consultant for the P&ID, I was never paid a dime and I never wrote an expert opinion on the matter.
“It is, however, unfortunate and embarrassing that my name found its way into the judgment delivered by the London court. How could I ever support a foreign firm to defraud Nigeria?”