Tuesday, December 24, 2024
Custom Text
Home NEWS Bolanle Raheem: Court fixes judgement day for police officer who shot pregnant...

Bolanle Raheem: Court fixes judgement day for police officer who shot pregnant lawyer

-

Gbadamosi argued that evidence of the prosecution witnesses did not link the defendant to the alleged murder of the lawyer Raheem.

By Jeffrey Agbo

A Lagos High Court has fixed Monday, October 9 for judgment in the case of a police officer, Drambi Vandi, charged with killing a Lagos-based lawyer, Bolanle Raheem, on December 25, 2022.

The court sitting at Tafawa Balewa Square gave the judgment date on July 13 after adoption of final written addresses by parties in the suit.

- Advertisement -

Vandi was arraigned on Jan. 16 on a count charge of murder but he pleaded not guilty.

The court granted accelerated hearing on the case.

Lagos State Government alleged that the defendant shot Raheem on the chest on Dec. 25, 2022, at Ajah Roundabout, on Lekki-Expressway, Lagos State.

The alleged murder contravenes Section 223 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.

Prosecution team led by the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr Moyosore Onigbanjo, called a total of 11 witnesses including eight police officers.

- Advertisement -

READ ALSO:

PHOTOS: Lawyer, Bolanle Raheem, killed on Christmas Day buried

Bolanle Raheem was expecting twins, says widower
Late Bolanle Raheem

The other prosecution witnesses are two eye witnesses and a pathologist.

Among the prosecution witnesses is Insp Matthew Ameh, who worked with the defendant at the time of the alleged murder.

The prosecution closed its case on February 25.

On Feb. 28, the defendant through his counsel, Mr Gbenro Gbadamosi, filed an application, praying the court to quash the charge against him.

Gbadamosi argued that evidence of the prosecution witnesses were inconsistent and did not link the defendant to the alleged murder of the lawyer Raheem.

On April 3, the court, however, dismissed the no-case submission.

Justice Ibironke Harrison held that prosecution established sufficient oral and documentary evidence linking the defendant to the alleged crime, which required explanation from him.

Harrison added that evidence by the defendant would shed light on what happened.

On May 31, the defendant gave evidence and closed his case.

His counsel had told the court that Vandi was the sole defence witness.

On July 13, the parties adopted their written addresses, and the court reserved judgment until October 9.

Must Read