Sunday, November 24, 2024
Custom Text
Home SPORTS Football Why Mourinho defended Kane over penalty criticism

Why Mourinho defended Kane over penalty criticism

-

By Valentine Amanze, Online Editor

Tottenham Hotspurs Manager, Jose Mourinho, has defended his captain, Harry Kane, who was allegedly conned the officials in the Premier League match with Brighton.

 He said that Kane did nothing wrong after the England forward was criticised for how he won a penalty in Tottenham Hotspur’s 2-1 win over Brighton at the weekend.

Recall that Kane appeared to draw a foul from Adam Lallana to win the spot-kick, which he then converted to open the scoring at home to the Seagulls.

- Advertisement -

But Mourinho, during his pre-match press conference ahead of Thursday’s Europa League tie away to Ludogorets, was adamant any fault lay with Lallana.

“Harry Kane was in a position to control the ball and Lallana came in a reckless fashion. Why are you saying it is clever?” Mourinho said. “Clever is taking the ball and scoring a goal. It’s a foul.”

The experienced Portuguese boss added: “I thought it was a direct free-kick but VAR said it was inside the box because it was on the line. What are we talking about being clever?

“Harry Kane just wants to score goals. Lallana was reckless.

“Why are you speaking about us? Speak about Liverpool, Manchester United, City and others with ‘clever’ players and getting penalties. Don’t speak about Harry Kane.”

- Advertisement -

Tottenham will be without Sergio Reguilon, Erik Lamela and Serge Aurier for the trip to Bulgaria after the trio missed training on Wednesday, according to AFP report.

“Reguilon is ill but not Covid, just ill,” said Mourinho. “Lamela was having a little problem for quite a few weeks and we decided it was the time to stop.

“Aurier has a little problem, nothing important.”

Must Read

Odinkalu versus Wike: A paradox of whims 

0
Odinkalu versus Wike: A paradox of whims  Odinkalu (L) and Wike By Sonny Ogulewe
Much ado about tax reforms

Much ado about tax reforms

Democracy as minority rule

Democracy as minority rule