HomeCOLUMNISTSThe aborted coup and Nigeria’s democracy: Matters arising

The aborted coup and Nigeria’s democracy: Matters arising

-

The current administration of President Bola Tinubu, is not an answer to the democracy Nigerians fought and died for, no doubts. It is rather a façade, indeed, a caricature of what democracy represents. But any attempt at removing it through the barrel of the gun, is certainly not an option. The alleged coup if successful, would have dealt huge blow to democracy and constitutional order in West Africa and the Continent where many look up to Nigeria for civility and rule of law.

By Emeka Alex Duru

Nigerians were understandably shocked at the disclosure by the Defence Headquarters (DHQ) of plans by some soldiers to oust the government of President Bola Tinubu. The development sounded strange, to put it mildly. According to the Director of Defence Information, Major-General Samaila Uba, early investigation into the alleged coup attempt has been completed and forwarded to appropriate superior authority in line with extant military regulations.

The military also explained that the preliminary investigation was comprehensive and conducted in line with established procedures, adding that it examined the circumstances surrounding the conduct of the affected soldiers.

- Advertisement -

“Accordingly, those with cases to answer will be formally arraigned before an appropriate military judicial panel to face trial in accordance with the Armed Forces Act and other applicable service regulations. This ensures accountability while upholding the principles of fairness and due process,” the DHQ stated.

Nipping the plot in the bud is commendable and proactive. It is however hoped that the allegation will be thoroughly interrogated and proven beyond reasonable doubts, to borrow a cliché from lawyers. Coups and military administrations have never been solutions to bad government but have rather compounded situations in some instances. Take the experiences in Liberia and Nigeria in 1980 and 1983, respectively for example.

I recall the excitement that seized some of us, then in secondary school, on April 12, 1980, when Samuel Doe, a Master-Sargent, took over the reins of power in Liberia through a military coup. Our animation, obviously borne of naivety, had nothing to do with the real situation in Liberia, which we had no firsthand knowledge of. It was rather in support of the coup that was then the fad in many African countries.

READ ALSO:

Tinubu’s second term and replay of Abacha self-succession antics

- Advertisement -

The reasons offered for the putsch and some of the actions by Doe and his men, also made us wish to be Liberians at that moment. The usurper regime had accused the civilian administration of William Tolbert which it overthrew, of monumental corruption and holding down the future of the country. And in what seemed the best of intentions, the military chaps promptly embarked on what seemed moral and economic rebirth in Liberia. Part of the actions in this regard, was the arrest of officials of the ousted administration and retrieval of alleged looted state funds from them.

While Doe rode on the crest of this revolutionary mission, he was lionized. But with time, he was seized by sycophantic members of the ruling class and got carried away. Over time, he became more corrupt than the members of the Tolbert government that he toppled. He resorted to repression, applying state apparatus to silence real and perceived opponents.

Liberians began to take notice of the massive drift by Doe, when he started turning his sword against his former comrades-in-arm. The state of anarchy became more pronounced when, after changing the constitution to announce himself president in a highly flawed election, Doe went after his close ally with whom he executed the 1980 coup, Gen. Thomas Quiwonkpa, in 1985, on allegation of attempting to take over the government by force. That and other bizarre actions by Doe, threw Liberia into a civil war that took toll on its citizens and corporate existence. The country is yet to recover from that tortuous route.

Here in Nigeria, General Muhammadu Buhari and his colleagues struck in the wee hours of December 31, 1983 and overthrew the civilian government of President Shehu Shagari. To be sure, the civilian government, at that time, had failed Nigerians in many respects. Apart from not delivering the axiomatic democracy dividends to the people, it had literally elevated corruption to the status of national policy. The carriage of the senior members of the administration, was quite nauseating. To cap it all, the 1983 general election which many had waited for to vote out the government, was massively rigged in favour of the administration. The mood in the land was abysmally low.

It was in such hopeless situation that the soldiers struck and were hailed. Buhari who was made the head of state, expressed disappointment that the politicians had wrecked the country and put the economy in serious predicament. In what seemed the needed assurance, Buhari roared; “This generation of Nigerians and indeed future generations have no other country than Nigeria. We shall remain here and salvage it together.” The plea touched the people and became for them, a mantra for patriotism and rebuilding the nation.

But few months into the administration, it became obvious that Buhari lacked definite programme and policies at fixing the country. He rather alienated himself from the people. The economy sunk deeper, inflation rose higher and basic food items, scarcer. The ill-advised currency change, which seemed targeted at some people, further put pressure on the system.

At the international front, Nigeria was losing it by the day, as it was serially being abandoned by its traditional friends. At home, the human rights record of the administration was piteous, with journalists and critics of the government hurled into detention on flimsy grounds. It was thus not surprising that Buhari was removed by some members of his cabinet led by the then Chief of Army Staff, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) on August 27, 1985. Babangida, was not better than his predecessor in many respects. For nine years, he rode the country like a rented bicycle. Subsequent Sani Abacha regime was the worst in terms of corruption and dictatorship. By 1999 when Nigeria returned to democracy, the country had lost much in essence and repute.

You can therefore understand why some of us were rattled at the announcement of attempts by some soldiers to take over power in the country. It was good that the military authorities assured that the situation was being taken care of. The current administration of President Bola Tinubu, is not an answer to the democracy Nigerians fought and died for, no doubts. It is rather a façade, indeed, a caricature of what democracy represents. But any attempt at removing it through the barrel of the gun, is certainly not an option. The coup if successful, would have dealt huge blow to democracy and constitutional order in West Africa and the Continent where many look up to Nigeria for civility and rule of law.

After 26 years of uninterrupted democracy in the country, any idea of coup is a distraction and serious disservice to the people and governance. Simply put; We do not want any coup in Nigeria. Let the soldiers limit themselves to their professional duties of protecting the country against external threats. They are not trained for civil governance. Democracy must be defended and consolidated.

It however needs be stated that good governance remains the panacea to unconstitutional change of power. To guard against coups, there is need for good governance and respect for the electoral system. Politicians should play by the rule and serve the people with dedication. That is the only way to exorcise the ghost of military coups or attempts in the country.

- Advertisment -Custom Text
- Advertisment -Custom Text
Custom Text