Racism everywhere in other countries but classism makes it worse in UK
By Jeph Ajobaju, Chief Copy Editor
Racism remains alive and well in the United Kingdom despite the royal household leading a change by reporting 8.5 per cent of its staff as ethnic minorities this year with a target of 10 per cent ratio in 2022.
Black British academics say racism percolates through all segments of society, including higher institutions of learning where Black scientists and researchers are denied recognition and promotion regardless of their academic excellence.
The 8.5 per cent Black and Asian staff in the royal household compares with ethnic minorities making up around 13 per cent of the UK population, according to the latest 2011 census.
The ratio is worse in other layers of British society.
There is indeed some form of racism – prejudice and discrimination based solely on colour of skin – in all countries in the world. What makes it worse in the UK is that racism is coupled with classism, which affects even Whites.
The British society is stratified into royalty, aristocracy, upper class, middle class, and working class. People are in this segregation by birth. There is little room for escape, no matter one’s achievements in life.
__________________________________________________________________
Related articles:
Bias against Blacks endemic in largest US, UK banks
Surge in UK racist sentiment scares Black activists
British Jews cringe in escalating racist attacks
Brexit fueled by racism backfires on Britons living in Europe
________________________________________________________________
Class system
The class system is defined as much by inheritance, wealth and accent, as by education and profession – which form your ascribed ‘social status’.
The UK comprises four nations – England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
Classism is used against White Britons from Liverpool, Manchester, Essex, and other generally ‘working class’ regions in England, as well as against White Britons who are Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish who speak with regional accents.
The White English, who account for 80 per cent of the population, classify into the lower rungs of the social ladder those with regional accents in England and those from the other three nations of Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
Black or White, once your parents are working class, attending private primary and secondary schools as well as Oxford or Cambridge will not lift you up to the upper class, let alone aristocracy and royalty. You were not ‘born’ into those classes.
This applies even if you speak ‘BBC English’ – the standard way in which middle-class speakers of southern British English pronounce words.
Both the public and private sectors in the UK are controlled by the middle class and above, who are populated by inbreeding. In the senior job space, they recruit their kind, even in academics which do not require race or class to excel.
The BBC reports below how classism couples racism to constitute a double whammy against Blacks, Asians, and other people of colour.
Race, a factor in getting academic jobs
Dr Jazmin Scarlett, a student in volcanology, had been excited to embark on a career in academic research. She believed she was well placed to get job offers given she has a distinction in her masters and is a recipient of the prestigious President’s medal from the Royal Geological Society.
But almost a year on from obtaining her PhD, Scarlett has received more than 30 rejections for full-time research posts. After one unsuccessful application, she asked for feedback, and was told that although she was academically qualified, it was felt she “would not fit in”.
She acknowledges that getting a job in academia isn’t easy, but suspects her race may be a factor.
“I feel almost paranoia that it is because of the colour of my skin. Because the feedback I constantly get has been: ‘Your CV is great, you are great in the interview, but there’s someone that’s got that little bit extra’ – and those people have been White.'”
She says that her peers who did PhDs around the same time as her and have taken the next step in their careers – as post doctoral researchers – are all White.
Scarlett says: “My credentials and my CV and experience for the position are great, but why is it that someone else has been hired instead of me?”
Many exceptionally gifted Black science students choose not to get to even Scarlett’s stage.
Jariatou Jarra wanted to research quantum mechanics when she started her physics degree at Imperial College London. After obtaining a First Class degree from one of the most prestigious scientific teaching institutions in the world, she decided to become a management consultant because she felt she did not belong.
“When you see that you don’t act the same, you don’t look the same, it becomes very hard to find yourself completely involved. And once you look at the (academic staff), you don’t see people that look like you in those positions where they would recommend you for a PhD, where they would support you. Because you don’t see that, it becomes hard to imagine what life would be like in that space”.
UK research institutionally racist
A Royal Society report, published earlier this year, shows that a greater proportion of Black people are dropping out – at every stage of their scientific careers – than their White counterparts, whereas many other ethnic minority groups are better represented.
Drawing on data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency, the Royal Society produced the first comprehensive analysis of the ethnicity of students and staff in science, technology, engineering and maths subjects in the UK.
It found that 6.5 per cent of Black people who begin research drop out, compared with 3.8 per cent White students. For those who remain in science, 3.5 per cent are made professors – whereas it’s nearly 12 per cent of their White counterparts who do.
Overall, Black people account for 1.7 per cent of research staff – whereas they make up 3.4 per cent of the UK population.
The president of the Royal Society, Prof Sir Adrian Smith, described the situation as “unacceptable”.
“Science is really important, and we have global challenges to meet. We need the very best talent and people to be involved and it is completely unacceptable that there are major groups that are not really involved at the moment.”
Christopher Jackson, a geoscience professor at Manchester University, told BBC News that he believes that publicly funded academic research in the UK, conducted mostly in universities, is “definitely institutionally racist”.
He said the problem is compounded by the fact that senior White scientists don’t recognise there is racism in their institutions.
“They say, ‘there is no discrimination amongst us because we’re clever, progressive and liberal’. But racism and racists persist within those networks too.
“They persist because they are not engaging to give Black people the support they need to navigate a system which is often quite alien to them and to tell you about some of the unspoken norms and hidden laws that are in there,” he explained.
According to Dr Mark Richards, an atmospheric researcher at Imperial College London, the data demonstrates that Black students and early career scientists are not getting the backing they need from their professors.
“They seem to show that there is an element of racism or structural bias,” he told BBC News.
The racism, he says, is very rarely overt or intentionally offensive. Rather it manifests itself subtly, he says. Academic careers depend on senior professors liking certain individuals: taking them under their wing by giving them support, advice, and opening doors for them.
“People look for a younger version of themselves,” says Prof Richards.
“If you are from an under-represented group, the likelihood of you being favoured is going to be reduced. While being liked is certainly a good quality, I don’t think it should be the determining factor. It should really be about the quality of your work and the merit of your efforts.”
Bias in research funding
Some Black academics are concerned that the research funding system is also biased against them. Last year, 10 Black women wrote an open letter to the UK Research and Innovation agency (UKRI), which is the body that allocates research grants.
They wrote it after failing to get any of the £4.3 million funding for research into the reasons why Black, Asian and other ethnic minority groups were harder hit by Covid infection than the White population.
An investigation by one of the signatories, Dr Addy Adelaine, found that the majority of funds went to White principal investigators and some to Asian scientists, and that none went to any lead Black researchers.
She described the allocation of funds to BBC News as a “kick in the teeth”.
“There seems to be these closed doors and, unless you are in that circle, there is no way in to raise the issues that will affect you in your community,” she says.
“There is frustration when you know what data is needed and how to help, but because of inequality, because of discrimination, there’s just this waste of knowledge and opportunity and time, which has real life or death consequences.”
Competition for such awards is intense: only six projects were awarded money. But Adelaine feels that the Black women who signed the letter to UKRI are in a better position to know what is happening in their communities than many of the recipients.
Active, ongoing dialogue
UKRI published a response by its chief executive, Prof Ottoline Leyser, this September – a full year after the publication of the open letter. In it, she apologised for the delayed response which was due to “active and ongoing dialogue on the issue”.
She added: “The persistent racial inequalities evident across the research sector, the stark data and, most importantly, the experiences people have suffered are deeply upsetting.
“We are working hard across the whole sector to deliver the interventions that will foster the inclusive and creative culture needed for research excellence, attracting, retaining, developing and valuing a full diversity of people.”
A spokesperson said: “UKRI’s work includes publishing detailed data to understand better the issue, piloting interventions such as anonymous applications and a narrative CV, and investing in ideas that support change, such as a programme to widen participation in postgraduate study.”
While welcoming her long awaited reply, Adelaine remains unimpressed.
“It has taken more than a year to try and get some kinds of responses and that in itself speaks volumes to how little Black academics are regarded. In that time, we had seen other open letters from White academics being responded to and noted.
“People there [who] have only just kind of stumbled upon this subject area, or only considered it for the first time over the past year, are trying to come up with solutions for creating change.
“Whereas there is this whole plethora of knowledge and expertise and passion that is right there and could be utilised. If only the power was to shift a little bit. It just seems like craziness to me.”
One of the ideas being considered is for funding to be tied to having independently assessed diversity ratings for research organisations.
Other steps could include
- substantial funding for scholarships for those wanting to study subjects in which Black students are underrepresented;
- funding to support Black students more generally; and
- an active commitment from research institutions to hire more Black staff at all levels.
Smith, the Royal Society president, agrees with those who are concerned there may be some unconscious racism in academia, with senior professors choosing – either consciously or unconsciously – to back people like themselves.
“A number of people have tried really hard (to tackle this problem) and I think it’s time we stopped talking about it and try to get to grips with the heart of the matter,” he says.
This “is why we’ve been drilling into the data, we have started getting round tables of interested parties and I think we have to come up with concrete ways forward.”
