Industrial Court declares indefinite leave without pay as unfair labour practice, orders Metro Digital Ltd to pay staff N480k
By Jude-Ken Ojinnaka
The National Industrial Court Yenagoa Division has declared the action of Metro Digital Limited directing Mr. Christian Okafor to proceed on indefinite unpaid leave as unfair labour practice.
The Court presided by Justice Policarp Hamman held that Metro Digital Limited could not justify the unilateral decision to force Mr. Christian Okafor to proceed on unpaid leave without any clear understanding of when he would be recalled and how his arrears of salary would be paid to him.
Justice Hamman ordered Metro Digital Limited to pay Mr Christian Okafor the sum of N480,000.00 as salary arrears for the months of November and December 2019, February and March 2020, and the sum of N5, 000,000.00 million as general damages within 30 days.
In the suit, Mr. Christian Okafor(claimant ) had submitted that Metro Digital Limited asked him to proceed on unpaid leave on the 27th of March 2020, and since he was expecting his recall, he did not take any appointment. He stated that when he started the unpaid leave, he was owed salary for the months of November and December 2019, and also February and March 2020 amounting to the sum of N480, 000.00, adding that all efforts to get his entitlement proved abortive.
In its defence, Metro Digital Limited (defendant) maintained that since the company was out of business from part of November 2019 till date, and Mr. Okafor never worked for the defendant throughout the period, he is not entitled to the salaries claimed.
The defendant’s counsel stated that the internal memo issued to Mr. Okafor and others terminated the contractual relationship partially by placing a conditional provision to same by way of not having activities to sustain Mr. Okafor’s continued employment and, urged the court to dismiss the case.
READ ALSO: CBN revokes Heritage Bank license over poor financial performance
In opposition, Mr. Okafor’s counsel, U. N. Aganin Esq argued that there is nothing before the Court to show that the employment of his client has been terminated, and the fact that an employer does not provide work for an employee does not mean that the employee is not entitled to his salaries. He urged the court to grant reliefs sought.
In a well-considered judgement, the presiding Judge, Justice Polycarp Hamman noted that the defendant has not denied placing Mr. Okafor on a compulsory unpaid leave and there is nothing before the court to show that Metro Digital Limited engaged either Mr. Okafor or all the workers in any form of negotiation before the decision was taken.
Justice Hamman faulted the action of Metro Digital Limited compelling the employees to proceed on an unpaid leave without pay as an unfair labour practice which the court deprecates with attendant consequences.
The court held that the contention of Metro Digital Limited that Mr. Okafor hastened to approach the court because over 40 employees were affected is only preposterous because the fact that the other employees chose to sleep on their rights does not in any way foreclose Mr. Okafor from coming to court.
