Friedrich August Hayek was by all means an impressive man, he made and continues to make a captivating read for his academic ideas and political considerations.
By Anthony Kila
In the summer of 1975, a few months just after she won her elections as leader of the Conservative Party, the future prime minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher, visited the Conservative Research Department for the first and indeed her last time. Chronicles of that day have it that participants at the event witnessed more than they envisaged; the day took a colourful turn when a well-prepared speaker set out to chart the course for the conservative party.
The message of the speaker’s paper was that the conservative party should take a pragmatic path in their campaign and in governing the country. The “middle way” was that way in the mind of the speaker. His speech advocated for the “middle way”, because according to him, it would pragmatically save the country from the risk of falling prey of extremism of the right and that of the left. A good approach dictated by common sense, one would think, but not for the “Iron Lady” in the making.
Before the speaker could finish his speech, Margaret Thatcher reached for her bag, pulled out a fat book, waved it up for all to see, like a Pentecostal Christian would display a bible, she interjected the speaker to solemnly and vigorously announce that, “This is what we believe!” and then slammed the book on the table like a chairperson would use a gavel to call a gathering to order.
The book slammed on the table on that summer afternoon by Margaret Thatcher was “The Constitution of Liberty” and it was written by our unforgettable of today, Friedrich August Hayek. He is known to most as a key figure of the Austrian School, a legal theorist, political philosopher, economist and above all defender of the classical economics and individualism. Arguably one of the most influential thinkers of the last 100 years, he was certainly a real knight of the free market and libertarianism.
Friedrich August Hayek was by all means an impressive man, he made and continues to make a captivating read for his academic ideas and political considerations. A Nobel prize winner and recipient of many awards, he was in one breath both illuminating and controversial in his speeches and writings. A truly renaissance man of our time, his area of studies and influence spans from law and political science to sociology and psychology to philosophy and economics.
READ ALSO: Vilfredo Pareto: The mathematical economist
Arthur Cecil Pigou: The Welfare Economist
David Ricardo: Accidental Father of Marxism
Friedrich August Hayek was born in Vienna in May 1899 to Felicitas Hayek who was a cousin to the Wittgensteins and Friedrich August von Hayek. The latter was a trained medical doctor turned professor of botany whose life as an academic was one of the major influences in the life of his children. Thanks to his mother’s relationship, our own Friedrich August Hayek was arguably the first person to read Ludwig Wittgenstein’s “The Tractatus Logico Philosophicus”.
Friedrich August Hayek’s “The Constitution of Liberty” turned gavel in the hand of the “Iron Lady” was first published in 1960. The book was a collection of essays in which our Knight articulated his views on the fundamental principles and concepts that guide the world we live in and the way we interact such as agriculture, employment, equity, freedom, government in its various forms, housing, law, merit, natural resources, taxation, individual freedom, private property, trade, tradition and then strongly posits that the only way we can have wealth and growth is by encouraging and safeguarding liberty.
For him, it is in liberty that we can generate wealth and prosperity, not wealth or prosperity that will make us free, individuals must be allowed to dare and risk, they must be allowed to freely act, not managed, planned or controlled by any authority no matter how well intentioned for “no human mind can comprehend all the knowledge which guides the actions of society”.
Interestingly, Friedrich August Hayek rounded up “The Constitution of Liberty” with a fascinating and illuminating post scriptum: an essay in which he declares and explains why he is not a conservative. Friedrich August Hayek used that post scriptum to make it clear, as if to set boundaries, that he is libertarian not a conservative because “unlike liberalism, with its fundamental belief in the long-range power of ideas, conservatism is bound by the stock of ideas inherited at a given time. And since it does not really believe in the power of argument, its last resort is generally a claim to superior wisdom, based on some self-arrogated superior quality”.
Friedrich August Hayek’s first major impact on British thinkers and policy makers and indeed those in the rest of the world however came to fore close to 20 years before publication of the “The Constitution of Liberty.”
He first established himself as an authority and a reference point with his “Road to Serfdom” a title, by Friedrich August Hayek’s own admission, clearly coined from the writings of the French philosopher and liberal thinker Alexis de Tocqueville’s “Road to Servitude”. In that book and his teachings and essays around the 1940s, Friedrich August Hayek made a passionate and articulate case against socialism and all forms of government controlled economic system, he denounced central planning and he warned that government intervention will only lead to tyranny and poverty not towards a richer or fairer society.
Against the British scholars and all those attracted to Marxism and socialism who argued that Fascism was a capitalist response to socialism, Friedrich August Hayek pointed out to all that Fascism, Nazism, Socialism and all forms of totalitarianism had their origin, common bond and lifeblood in the central controlled economy and the subjugation of individuals to the government. The eventual decline of a society, with an economy centrally managed (by the state) for any reason, no matter how noble the intention might appear, into tyranny and poverty was neither an error nor a probability. For him, such decline was a certainty. Taking a rather radical position, he warned that the drive towards welfare programmes and policies at the expense of individual liberty and expressions was a gradual but sure path to slavery of all rather than the emancipation of the most. The answer for him was the market, expressed through price.
Readers of Friedrich August Hayek in developing countries will readily observe that as he predicted, systems and countries where the economic power and access to wealth lies mostly in the visible hands of the government of the day, are also systems and countries where nepotism, corruption, scarcity and poverty thrives under an oligarchic and prebendal arrangement.
Join me on twitter @anthonykila to continue these conversations.
- Anthony Kila is Centre Director at CIAPS Lagos. (www.ciaps.org)
