The war and lingering Igbo question
By Ogechi Okoro
The guns fell silent in 1970, but psychological wounds do not obey ceasefires. Decades after the Nigerian civil war, the trauma of that period continues to shape the political and social realities of the Igbo people. Officially, the war ended with reconciliation. Unofficially, many Igbos still grapple with a lingering sense of exclusion within Nigeria’s political landscape. It is important to speak about this not from a place of bitterness, but from realism.
The decision to embark on the civil war was, in hindsight, a tragic and devastating gamble. It was a suicidal mission in many respects, costing millions of lives and setting the region back economically and socially. Yet at that historical moment, it may have seemed like the only viable option for survival and self-determination. History often forces difficult choices on people, and clarity usually comes only decades later.
READ ALSO: Remembering Robert Duvall as Tom Hagen: The quiet power behind the Godfather
Since the war, the Igbo have worked tirelessly to reintegrate. Through enterprise, education, and resilience, they have rebuilt from near ruin. They have contributed enormously to Nigeria’s economic growth and national development. In many cases, they have chosen peace over confrontation, even when they felt justified in demanding more assertive redress. Yet a subtle suspicion lingers.
There remains a perception in some quarters that the Igbo political ambition is dangerous, or that their quest for equal participation masks a hidden agenda. This framing is both unfair and unhelpful. All the Igbo seek, like every other group in Nigeria, is equal partnership in the affairs of the nation.
Political disagreement among Igbos is often weaponised in ways it is not elsewhere. When two Igbo politicians differ, it is sometimes portrayed as betrayal or evidence of disunity. Yet political competition among other ethnic groups is treated as a normal democratic expression. No ethnic group in Nigeria has ever been politically homogeneous. From the earliest days of independence, leaders across regions disagreed sharply, even within their own communities. Why then should political plurality among Igbos be treated as a flaw rather than a democratic strength?
The narrative of “Igbo disunity” has also been exaggerated. In reality, Igbo communal structures, both at home and in the diaspora, are among the most organised and self-sustaining in the country. Town unions, age grades, community associations, and diaspora networks demonstrate a strong culture of collective responsibility. The philosophy of onye aghala nwanne ya (let no one abandon their kinsmen) remains deeply embedded in Igbo identity. The challenge is not internal collapse; it is external perception.
However, framing the issue as “Nigeria versus the Igbo” oversimplifies a complex national problem. Nigeria’s governance challenges, corruption, institutional weakness, economic inequality, affect all regions. The path forward cannot be ethnic defensiveness. It must be institutional fairness.
True national unity is not achieved by demanding silence from aggrieved groups. It is achieved by building systems where no group feels perpetually scrutinised or politically constrained. Equality must move from rhetoric to structure.
Perhaps the more constructive question is not what Nigeria wants from the Igbos, but what kind of Nigeria can guarantee fairness for all its citizens. A nation confident in itself does not fear the ambition of any group. It harnesses it.
Despite everything, it is not all bleak. The Igbo story since 1970 is one of remarkable resilience. From ashes came rebuilding. From exclusion came innovation. From trauma came tenacity. That resilience is not a threat to Nigeria, it is an asset.
The war may be over, but the deeper work of trust-building remains unfinished. The future depends not on revisiting old battle lines, but on creating a political culture where equality is unquestionable and belonging is not conditional.
And perhaps, in that sense, it is not that bad after all.
- Dr. Ogechi Okoro writes from Hamilton New Zealand
