By Onyewuchi Ojinnaka
A Federal High Court sitting in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria has convicted and sentenced a hacker, one Eric Nnamdi Obulo to one year imprisonment, for hacking the data base of Polaris Bank and defrauded the bank to the tune of $70, 000.00.
Eric Nnamdi Obulo was found guilty and convicted by Justice I.M Sani after being re-arraigned by the Port Harcourt Zonal Office of the Economic And Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), on one- count charge bordering on unlawful interception by technical means, into Polaris Bank’s data base and in the process, collected the sum of $70,000.00.
The one count was read to him after which he pleaded guilty to the charge. Following his plea, the prosecuting counsel, K. W Chukwuma-Eneh prayed the court to convict and sentence the convict accordingly.In his submission, the defence counsel, D.E. Nowo, pleaded for leniency in view of the convict’s ” remorse and being a first- time offender who did not waste the precious time of the court”
Justice Sani consequently convicted and sentenced Eric Nnamdi Obulo to one year imprisonment with an option of fine of N5 million .
Obulo ran into trouble when Polaris Bank filed a petition against him, with the Port Harcourt Zonal Office of the EFCC on October 14, 2019. The petitioner stated that, sometime in October, 2019, the bank’s database and core banking applications were manipulated by unknown fraudsters, resulting in the crediting of six accounts belonging to the convict with a total sum of Seventy Thousand United States Dollars
The one-count charge read: “That you Eric Nnamdi Obulo, on or about July, 2019 in Port Harcourt, Rivers state, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court did intercept by technical means the data base of Polaris Bank and in the process took possession of the sum of Seventy Thousand Dollars {$70, 000.00} into your Polaris Bank Account no. 2130049253 and thereby committed an Offense contrary to Section 12 (1) of the Cybercrime (Prohibition Prevention etc.) Act 2015 and punishable under the same section of the Act”.