Direct Primaries: Buhari acted in national interest, says Presidency

Buhari

Direct primaries entail significant legal, financial, economic and security consequences for all Nigerians, principal among which would be a severe spike in the cost of holding primary elections by parties, Buhari argues.

By Emma Ogbuehi

President Muhammadu Buhari’s decision to withhold his assent to the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021, was in the best interest of the country.

This is contained in a statement issued by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu.  According to the release, the President’s Office has decided to issue an official statement to make its position clear.

Various reactions have trailed the recommendation of the National Assembly in the Electoral Act Amendment bill for direct primaries as mode of selection of candidates for all political parties.

The National Assembly contended that direct primaries will give room for inclusion and reduce the influence of political godfathers.

READ ALSO:

PDP kicks against direct primaries

But the Presidency had maintained that the proposed amendments entail significant legal, financial, economic, and security consequences for all Nigerians, including cost of holding primary elections by political parties.

The statement read in part: “Nigeria’s strength as a nation and its status as one of the wealthiest economies in Africa with one of its highest standards of living owes above all to its proud democratic processes, which are enshrined in the Electoral Act of 2010.

“It is this act (Direct Primaries) which the new bill seeks to amend. These amendments have been presented as a means to enhance and build upon our democratic processes. After careful review, the President’s Office has found that the opposite is true.

“Rather, the proposed amendments entail significant legal, financial, economic and security consequences for all Nigerians, principal among which would be a severe spike in the cost of holding primary elections by parties – integral to democracies the world over.

“And who would shoulder these costs? The Nigerian taxpayer of course. And who would benefit? Only the richest of political parties. At a time when the nation is seeking to extricate itself from the economic mire of the worst global health crisis in living memory, whatever other merits the new bill may have, now is not the time for such frivolous spending of public money.

“Inevitably, the usual voices are making themselves heard, with cynical claims of election rigging and so on. This is nothing new. We heard their self-serving cries of fraud in 2015 when we saw the first peaceful transfer of power in independent Nigeria’s history. Then again in 2019, when President Buhari was re-elected with a lead of over three million. We will hear them again in 2023.

“Until then, the President will do whatever he can to protect this county’s democracy, and that includes withholding assent from this Bill. It is worth noting that, as one of Nigeria’s largest political parties, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is one of those that stand to benefit from a bill that favours wealthier parties. But it is not the job of this government to protect the APC. It is the job of this government to protect Nigeria, its people, and its democracy.

“To those that would rather that limited public funds be spent on politicking during this time of global crisis, we say: cease these cynical games. Tell the Nigerian people openly what you want. Put your – or rather they’re – money where your mouth is.”

Admin 2:
Related Post