Sifax Group wants the court to declare it as the successful bidder for the concession of Murtala Muhammed International Airport.
By Jeffrey Agbo
The Lagos Division of the Federal High Court has stopped the planned concession of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, and cargo terminals pending the hearing and determination of a suit.
Sifax Group of Companies Limited filed the suit challenging the Federal Government’s bidding process.
Joined as defendants in the suit are the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami; the Federal Government; Minister of Aviation, Hadi Sirika; NAHCO Aviance Plc; Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission; TAV Airports Holding Company and GMR Airport Limited as first to seventh defendants.
Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa, on Monday, ordered parties to maintain status quo following an application by Sifax lawyer, Kunle Ogunba (SAN).
The judge overruled the objection raised by the fourth and sixth defendants’ lawyer, Adeseye Opasanya (SAN), to the suit.
The first, second and third defendants were, however, not represented by any lawyer. Further hearing of the matter has been adjourned to March 29, 2023.
Sifax, in its statement of claims, said that it was one of the 13 firms that submitted a bid for the contract after the third defendant issued a formal Request for Qualification stating that no applicant is expected to bid twice for any of the specific assets under any guise or form.
READ ALSO:
NAHCO apologises over confusion at Lagos Airport
The plaintiff further claimed that contrary to the misleading impression that both the sixth and seventh defendants are separate entities, a search on the internet revealed a contrary position.
It was disclosed that a firm, Airport De Paris, owned 49 per cent and 46 per cent shares in the sixth and seventh defendants respectively.
The plaintiff further added that having contravened the Request for Qualification without any legal basis, the sixth and seventh respondents should be disqualified from participating in the tender or joining any group in future, saying their action is a demonstration of dishonesty and deliberate attempt to deceive the contracting authority.
The plaintiff is seeking for the following declarations among others:
“A declaration and a concomitant order that the submission of separate bids by the 6th and 7th respondents with the impression that they are separate entities without any admixture of ownership structure amounts to a material misrepresentation and a breach of Section 2.2, and Sub-section 2.2.1 of RFQ.
“An order directing the 3rd respondent to immediately disqualify 6th defendant-led consortium and the 7th defendant’s submission, as well as ADP as a standalone party from participating in the tender or joining any group in the future after the announcement of pre-qualification results.
“A declaration and concomitant order that the plaintiff is the most qualified applicant/bidder in the bidding process, both in terms of commercial and technical components of the entire bidding exercise and therefore should/ought to be declared the successful bidder for the concession of Murtala Muhammed International Airport.”