Reprieve came the way of Chioma Okoli, a lady embroiled in controversy with Erisco foods over one of its brands, as she was granted bail in the sum of N5m and two sureties in like sum.
By Emma Ogbuehi
Reprieve came the way of Chioma Okoli, a lady embroiled in controversy with Erisco foods over one of its brands, as she was granted bail in the sum of N5m and two sureties in like sum.
Justice Peter Lifu, of an Abuja Federal High Court, who granted the bail on Friday, held that one of the sureties must be the defendant’s spouse or a blood relatiion with a variable source of income who resides within the jurisdiction of the court.
The judge also ordered the sureties to deposit a passport photograph each.
He instructed the defendant to also deposit her international passport if any.
Okoli is facing a two-count charge bordering on cybercrime.
READ ALSO:
Erisco Foods gets bad press on CNN for harassing woman who made negative review of its tomato paste
Okoli was sued over a Facebook post she shared on September 17, 2023, where she made some commentary on Erisco Foods Limited’s tomato paste.
In her post, she claimed she purchased Nagiko Tomato Mix from Erisco Foods, the day before and found it utterly sugary.
Chioma’s initial comment on Facebook read: “I went to buy tin tomatoes yesterday that I will use to make stew. I didn’t see Gino and Sonia. So, I decided to buy this one. When I opened it, I decided to taste it. Omo! Sugar was just too much. Ha, biko, let me know if you have used this tin tomato before because this is an Ike gwuru situation.”
Her post, however, generated reactions and forced the management of the company to involve the police through a petition to the Inspector-General.
Erisco’s founder, Chief Eric Umeofia is demanding N5 billion over Chioma’s review which he claimed had cost his company severe financial loss. In the alternative, he wants her to spend a long time in jail as retribution for the comment she made against his product
The controversy also got the attention of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control.
This prompted NAFDAC to embark on a scrutiny of the product’s registration and an overall inspection of the Erisco Foods’ Nagiko Tomato Mix’.
The trial judge, in his ruling, on Friday, agreed with the arguments of the defendant’s lawyer, Inibehe Effiong, that the offence with which Okoli was charged was a bailable one.
Justice Lifu further held that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty under Section 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
Justice Lifu also held that denying her bail is a wrong application of discretion which will amount to a pre-trial judgment and judicial rascality.
He equally based the ruling on the health status of Okoli.
On this ground, he granted her bail request while he adjourned the matter until June 13 for further hearing.
She was arraigned on Tuesday before Justice Lifu.
Although she pleaded not guilty to all the counts, the judge ordered her remand till today to deliver a ruling on her bail application.
Earlier, the prosecution counsel, Abdulrashid Sidi, urged the court to reject the bail application that was moved by the defence counsel, Effiong.
Sidi had objected to the bail application on the ground that given the history and antecedent of the defendant, there was a likelihood that she would jump bail.
The prosecution informed the court specifically that the defendant had, while on administrative bail, refused to honour the bail terms and would most likely jump bail.